Long Term Disability Insurance/ERISA

If you are fortunate, then your employer provides you with disability insurance. When you become disabled, this insurance pays you a percentage of your salary, and you are not solely dependent on Social Security Disability.

In real life, it is never that simple because insurance companies try to avoid paying out too much in benefits, especially for severely disabling, chronic diseases with no treatment such as ME/CFS. There is a very complicated world of government regulations and case law that govern these policies and are supposed to keep things “fair.”

The Department of Labor has now proposed new regulations that will strengthen protections for disabled workers, and require the insurance companies to play more fair. The public comment period closes on January 19th, and you can be certain that the insurance companies are opposing these changes.

I’ve been too sick, and we’ve had several new family crises this month, so I have not been able to do much work on this. However, Jeannette Burmeister has done a fantastic job explaining the proposed changes and making suggestions for public comment over on her blog. I highly recommend you check out her three excellent posts on the subject, and then consider submitting a comment yourself:

Summary of Proposed Regulations

Sample Public Comment

Additional Guidance on Commenting

 

Posted in Advocacy | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Long Term Disability Insurance/ERISA

Survey: Barriers to NIH Funding

Reprinted with permission of Lily Chu:

Over the years, IACFS/ME Board members have heard anecdotally from researchers, clinicians, and others that obtaining government-sponsored funding for research related to ME/CFS can be quite challenging, in some cases more challenging than that for other fields or medical conditions. Reasons that have been brought up include poor funding overall for the field, grant reviewers’ lack of familiarity with the condition, and lack of funding programs/ initiatives specifically targeting ME/CFS.

Proposed and planned actions might not be successful if they do not address existing barriers. Thus, we are polling the ME/CFS community this and next month regarding their views and experiences with regard to applying for government-sponsored funding. We also want to hear any ideas you may have for governments to stimulate or support research.

The poll is short (12 items total), anonymous, and open to anyone. We encourage non-IACFS/ME members as well as the international community to participate. Even if you are not involved in conducting research, we want to hear from you although some survey items might not apply to you. We hope to share poll results both in a future edition of this Newsletter as well as with US federal agencies and officials. Your participation in the poll can inform and influence future science policy so click on the link below to go to the poll and feel free to share the link with as many people as you wish. Thanks for participating!

Click to participate: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/ZLWB838

Posted in Advocacy, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

NIH RFA Ticker, 1/11/16

ticker

  • Total RFAs Issued by NIH: 103 (October 2015 to date)
  • Total Dollars Committed to RFAs: $1,431,750,000 (October 2015 to date)
  • Total RFAs for ME/CFS: ZERO (October 2015 to date)
Week Beginning RFAs Issued Total Commitment RFAs for ME/CFS
1/4/16 0 $0 Zero
12/28/15 0 $0 Zero
12/21/15 3 $10,260,000 Zero
12/18/15 5 $20,260,000 Zero
12/11/15 27 $765,090,000 Zero
12/4/15 6 $26,600,000 Zero
11/27/15 4 $21,000,000 Zero
11/20/15 15 $134,400,000 Zero
11/13/15 2 $16,100,000 Zero
11/6/15 10 $22,850,000 Zero
10/30/15 7 $49,800,000 Zero
10/23/15 10 $33,200,000 Zero
10/16/15 0 $0 Zero
10/9/15 13 $332,450,000 Zero

If you want more background on the RFA Ticker, read the inaugural post.

Posted in Advocacy, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

NIH RFA Ticker, 1/4/16

ticker

  • Total RFAs Issued by NIH: 103 (October 2015 to date)
  • Total Dollars Committed to RFAs: $1,431,750,000 (October 2015 to date)
  • Total RFAs for ME/CFS: ZERO (October 2015 to date)
Week Beginning RFAs Issued Total Commitment RFAs for ME/CFS
12/28/15 0 $0 Zero
12/21/15 3 $10,260,000 Zero
12/18/15 5 $20,260,000 Zero
12/11/15 27 $765,090,000 Zero
12/4/15 6 $26,600,000 Zero
11/27/15 4 $21,000,000 Zero
11/20/15 15 $134,400,000 Zero
11/13/15 2 $16,100,000 Zero
11/6/15 10 $22,850,000 Zero
10/30/15 7 $49,800,000 Zero
10/23/15 10 $33,200,000 Zero
10/16/15 0 $0 Zero
10/9/15 13 $332,450,000 Zero

If you want more background on the RFA Ticker, read the inaugural post.

Posted in Advocacy, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

NIH RFA Ticker, 12/28/15

ticker

  • Total RFAs Issued by NIH: 103 (October 2015 to date)
  • Total Dollars Committed to RFAs: $1,431,750,000 (October 2015 to date)
  • Total RFAs for ME/CFS: ZERO (October 2015 to date)
Week Ending RFAs Issued Total Commitment RFAs for ME/CFS
12/21/15 3 $10,260,000 Zero
12/18/15 5 $20,260,000 Zero
12/11/15 27 $765,090,000 Zero
12/4/15 6 $26,600,000 Zero
11/27/15 4 $21,000,000 Zero
11/20/15 15 $134,400,000 Zero
11/13/15 2 $16,100,000 Zero
11/6/15 10 $22,850,000 Zero
10/30/15 7 $49,800,000 Zero
10/23/15 10 $33,200,000 Zero
10/16/15 0 $0 Zero
10/9/15 13 $332,450,000 Zero

If you want more background on the RFA Ticker, read the inaugural post.

Posted in Advocacy, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Collaborative Effort Announced

I take the responsibility of advocacy very seriously, and collaborating with others is part of my philosophy. This effort is an organic evolution of work by many other advocates that have come before us.

More than ever before, 2015 has been a year that has brought fresh hope to Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME) patients. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) and NIH Pathways to Prevention (P2P) reports confirmed the neglect and disbelief that have held the disease hostage for decades and strongly recommended action to improve patient care. Publications from Stanford, Columbia and Haukeland (Norway) Universities brought new insights into the biology. World-renowned scientists have joined the fight. Stories about severely ill patients like Ron Davis’s son have created more public awareness. And the Tuller series brought greater exposure to the concerns with the PACE trial and psychogenic theories.

For the first time, there’s a sense that we have huge opportunities to change the future for ME patients. And just as importantly, there’s a sense that if we want to turn those opportunities into reality, then we need to find new ways to work together across the community to increase the impact of our voices.

To that end, a number of organizations, bloggers and independent advocates, listed below, have started having discussions to identify those areas where they can agree on goals and work together to achieve what is needed for patients.

Thus far, we have identified common goals to focus on, including the need to dramatically increase funding, to advance the research agenda, to resolve the definitional challenges, and to improve clinical care through quality medical education. We expect that this will lead to actions directed toward Congressional leaders, HHS and its agencies, and public awareness through the media.

To achieve these goals, we are going to need broad participation across the community. We will leverage the Groups feature on the MEAction.net platform to get input on these goals and to share proposals for joint actions. Because we are working as a loose collaboration, groups and individuals will be given the opportunity to opt in or opt out of specific actions.

Working in this way and at this scale is new for all of us and we will be learning as we go. We also know that we won’t all agree on every tactic or policy direction. But we believe there is power in numbers and coordination and are all committed to taking advantage of every opportunity that we can to regain our future.

Please join us and share your ideas and enthusiasm. If you are interested in participating and providing input, you can join in the discussion on MEAction Groups here: http://www.meaction.net/us-action-working-groups/

Signed:

Patient Organizations

Connecticut CFIDS Association, Inc.

ImmuneDysfunction.org dba The Vermont CFIDS Association, Inc

Massachusetts CFIDS/ME & FM Association

The Myalgic Encephalomyelitis Action Network (#MEAction)

Open Medicine Foundation (OMF)

New Jersey ME/CFS Association, Inc.

Pandora Org

Phoenix Rising

Simmaron Research

Solve ME/CFS Initiative

Wisconsin ME and CFS Association, Inc.

 

Patient blogs

Health Rising (Cort Johnson)

OccupyCFS (Jennifer Spotila)

Onward Through the Fog (Erica Verrillo)

Race to Solve ME/CFS (Claudia Goodell)

Speak Up About ME (Denise Lopez-Majano)

 

Independent Advocates

Lily Chu. MD, MSHS

Mary Dimmock

Steve Krafchick, MPH, JD

Robert and Courtney Miller

Donna Pearson

Staci R. Stevens, MA

 

Posted in Advocacy | Tagged , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

NIH RFA Ticker, 12/21/15

ticker

  • Total RFAs Issued by NIH: 99 (October 2015 to date)
  • Total Dollars Committed to RFAs: $1,421,750,000 (October 2015 to date)
  • Total RFAs for ME/CFS: ZERO (October 2015 to date)
Week Ending RFAs Issued Total Commitment RFAs for ME/CFS
12/18/15 5 $20,260,000 Zero
12/11/15 27 $765,090,000 Zero
12/4/15 6 $26,600,000 Zero
11/27/15 4 $21,000,000 Zero
11/20/15 15 $134,400,000 Zero
11/13/15 2 $16,100,000 Zero
11/6/15 10 $22,850,000 Zero
10/30/15 7 $49,800,000 Zero
10/23/15 10 $33,200,000 Zero
10/16/15 0 $0 Zero
10/9/15 13 $332,450,000 Zero

If you want more background on the RFA Ticker, read the inaugural post.

Posted in Advocacy, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The NIH RFA Ticker

tickerToday, I’m debuting a new weekly feature that I call the NIH RFA Ticker. My goal is to give you the data you need to help assess whether NIH is doing all it can to promote and fund ME/CFS research.

First, a little background. “RFA” stands for Request for Applications, and it is an announcement from NIH saying, basically, we will fund $X amount of research on Y topic. This is different from regular funding opportunities, because the money has been set aside. If enough meritorious grants are received, that money WILL be awarded. That’s different from tossing your application into the general pool and hoping it floats.

NIH last issued an RFA for CFS research in 2006, and we’ve been begging for another ever since. The CFS Advisory Committee has recommended one, advocates have petitioned for one, and both the IACFS/ME and members of Congress have asked for one. Ever since the NIH announcement about reinvigorating ME/CFS research on October 29, 2015, many advocates have been asking if we will finally see an RFA.

NIH has offered a variety of excuses for not issuing one in the past: there are not enough scientists interested in this area; there is not enough data to appropriately target one; or NIH does not receive enough ME/CFS applications to justify one. But RFAs are a tried and true mechanism for stimulating research in specific areas. If NIH really wanted to jump start ME/CFS research, a guaranteed infusion of cash would attract researchers like flies.

So I decided that we need to start counting NIH RFAs. Just how many does NIH issue, and for how much money? This is very easy to do. Each week, NIH sends out an email listing the new RFAs and funding opportunity announcements. The information is also archived on the web.

Starting with the first full week of October 2015 (because that coincides with the beginning of the federal fiscal year on October 1st), I have counted how many RFAs NIH has issued and for how much money. I will update this ticker every Monday. Let’s see if NIH can come through for us like they do for many other areas of scientific interest.

NIH RFA Ticker

  • Total RFAs Issued by NIH, to date: 94
  • Total Dollars Committed to RFAs, to date: $1,401,490,000
  • Total RFAs for ME/CFS, to date: ZERO
Week Ending RFAs Issued Total Commitment RFAs for ME/CFS
12/11/15 27 $765,090,000 Zero
12/4/15 6 $26,600,000 Zero
11/27/15 4 $21,000,000 Zero
11/20/15 15 $134,400,000 Zero
11/13/15 2 $16,100,000 Zero
11/6/15 10 $22,850,000 Zero
10/30/15 7 $49,800,000 Zero
10/23/15 10 $33,200,000 Zero
10/16/15 0 $0 Zero
10/9/15 13 $332,450,000 Zero

 

Posted in Advocacy, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 26 Comments

Saying No

lotus flower buddhaHow To Live Well with Chronic Pain and Illness is Toni Bernhard’s latest book. I’ve reviewed Toni’s previous books (here, here, and here), but over the course of years, Toni has become one of my most beloved friends. So while she provided me with an advance copy of How To Live Well free of charge, it doesn’t feel right to “review” the book. I love Toni, I love the book, but that’s not really a helpful book review. So instead, I thought I would share how I engage with the text and apply Toni’s lessons in a way that makes sense for my life.

I’m going to out myself right now by revealing the hardest – absolute hardest – lesson that I am trying to learn from Toni: saying no as an act of self-compassion. Toni writes about this in chapter 4 of How To Live Well:

Unless saying yes would be true, kind, and helpful to me, I’m working on saying no.

Toni shares that it is hard for her to do this because she was raised to accommodate others. I was raised to put my family first above all else, and then to put meaningful work above all else. I learned by example that my personal comfort and health do not come first. And I have also learned through hard experience that this is a recipe for disaster when coupled with a chronic disease.

The first part of Toni’s test is whether saying yes would be true to yourself. She explains:

When you become aware that it might be time to say no, either to what you’re doing (such as continuing to work) or to what others are asking of you, stop and ask yourself what would be true to yourself. Will your response reflect your values?

This is so hard for me in the realm of advocacy. Over and over, I hold my work and participation to a high standard. I participate in advocacy precisely because it reflects my values. But Toni’s test doesn’t stop with that. She goes on to say:

Will it ease your suffering – mentally and physically – as opposed to intensifying it? Finally, ask yourself what the self-protective and self-compassionate response would be in this situation.

I completely understand why so many patients take breaks from advocacy, or never get involved much in the first place. ME/CFS advocacy is like David facing Goliath without his slingshot. It is a hard uphill slog each and every day because there is so much resistance to progress. It’s not impossible, and it’s not without successes. And there are certainly many allies to collaborate with. But for ten years, I have persisted in advocacy despite the fact that it intensifies my physical suffering. I was too sick to go to the P2P meeting last year, but I did it anyway. I was too sick to give my IOM presentation, but did it anyway by phone only because I had a high fever and had spent three days in bed. I throw my body down on the train tracks more often than not. But stepping back would not be true to my values and ethics, even though it would ease my suffering. How to reconcile these conflicting impulses? I don’t know.

The second part of Toni’s test is whether saying no would be kind and helpful to yourself. She writes:

In working with this test, I apply helpful to what I think would benefit my emotional and mental well-being. Then I apply kindness to my body. Often what’s helpful to my mind is not kind to my body . . . This means that even if saying yes would be uplifting mentally, if it’s not also kind to my body, I should be saying no.

I don’t do this. I prioritize what benefits me emotionally much more than what would be kind to my body. As just one example, I attended a concert with several loved ones before Thanksgiving. I knew I would love it, and in fact, I was completely transfixed by the experience. And I used my wheelchair to minimize the strain on my body. But going out at night always induces a crash. In making the calculation to do something like this, I usually decide I don’t care how much it hurts afterwards. In fact, if I did not sacrifice my physical comfort, I would likely only leave home for doctor appointments, and would have even less of a life than I do now.

I also faced this calculation during the last two years my mother was sick with cancer. I helped my Dad take care of her, making it possible for him to keep working. I can’t drive or do housework, but I kept her company, supported her emotionally, and kept her eating. And every time I came home from staying with her, I crashed. My husband would take care of me, and then I would go back for the next treatment cycle. I was too sick to be doing this, I was too sick to be in the hospital with her as much as I was at the end, too sick to stay with her for the days of hospice care. But I did it anyway. I gladly sacrificed my physical comfort and even perhaps my long-term health in order to take care of my Mom. And I am so glad that I did. I absolutely treasure that time I had with her. Saying no would have protected my body but injured my soul.

Toni has faced this too. She writes,

I used to let what I thought would help my emotional well-being trump what I thought would be kind to my body – and that may be warranted on special occasions . . . This may not be the case for everyone but, for me, a day spent in bed feeling terribly sick almost always wipes out whatever emotional benefit I gained from the evening [out].

I don’t see this as black and white, and I don’t think Toni does either. Sometimes we have to tip the balance toward emotional well-being over physical comfort. But what I’m trying to learn from Toni is to tip the balance a little bit more towards protecting my physical well-being. My instinct, especially where my family is concerned, is to say yes even when I know my body will suffer. I’m trying to dial it back, and be a bit more selfish self-compassionate than I am naturally inclined to be.

How To Live Well is, like Toni’s other books, very compassionate and gentle. She concludes the chapter on saying no by saying, “Think of it as a practice. That way, you won’t hold yourself to too high a standard.” This is one reason why I find Toni’s books to be so helpful: she only makes suggestions and shares what works for her. Try it, experiment, and see if it works for you. But if not, that’s ok.

For me, deep reflection on Toni’s writing reveals the wisdom behind her practical advice. Each chapter in How To Live Well is short and seems straightforward. But I find layers of meaning and lessons in each short chapter. So I’m practicing. “No” is not as comfortable a word for me as it should be, but I’m practicing.

Posted in Commentary, Occupying | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 16 Comments

A Year of Thanks

bigstock-Gratitude-37954498This year has been hard, y’all. HARD. Sometimes I think that my Mom’s death took a scoop of my soul along with her. And then just over six months later, my husband (my caregiver, my best friend, my everything) had a stroke. So when I say this year has been hard, what I really mean is this year has been a journey through a dark, terrifying, life-changing, earth-shattering, health-destroying, nauseating, twisting tunnel that we do not quite see the end of yet. HARD.

And so it is time to give thanks.

I am grateful for everything my mother taught me, from how to read a scientific paper, to how to make meatloaf, to how to nurture others, to how to be a feminist.

I am grateful – so overwhelmingly grateful – that my husband is alive, still my caregiver, my best friend, my everything. I am grateful to the healthcare professionals who have helped him on his recovery, and grateful that we live near a city that has some of the best medical help available in the country.

I am grateful to our families and to our friends, both the old friends who have come through at every turn and the new friends who have shown up. And I am especially grateful to my friends whom I mostly know through the phone or email, but who are just as dear to me as the friend who can give us a ride to the ER on a Saturday afternoon.

I am grateful to my own body, for not collapsing under the weight of this year. Well done, body. I’m trying to take care of you. I am grateful to my own healthcare team for playing its role in keeping me going.

This week, especially, I don’t want to focus on HARD. I just want to treasure all the gratitude I can make space for in my life.

Thou knowest full well, O my God, that tribulations have showered upon me from all directions and that no one can dispel or transmute them except Thee. – The Bab

Posted in Occupying | Tagged , , , , , | 8 Comments