Subscribe to Blog via Email
Pages
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Jennie Spotila on Getting a Normal Result
- Maureen on Getting a Normal Result
- Kathy Durkin on Getting a Normal Result
- Jennie Spotila on Getting a Normal Result
- Jennie Spotila on Getting a Normal Result
Archives
- October 2024
- September 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- June 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- August 2022
- May 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- November 2019
- August 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
Meta
Tags
- accountability
- action
- activism
- biomarkers
- case definition
- CBT
- CDC
- CFIDS Association
- CFSAC
- coping
- covid-19
- CPET
- DHHS
- disability
- drugs
- exercise
- family
- FDA
- funding
- GET
- government
- grants
- IOM
- living with
- Millions Missing
- NIH
- occupy
- orthostatic intolerance
- P2P
- pacing
- pain
- politics
- post-exertional malaise
- priorities
- psychosocial
- recommendations
- researchers
- RFA
- RFA Ticker
- speaking out
- spending
- stress
- suffering
- testimony
- treatment
Tag Archives: occupy
P2P Obstacles
Are you working on your comments on the P2P Panel’s Draft Report? I hope so! Unfortunately, the Office of Disease Prevention (ODP) has taken several actions that create barriers in the commenting process. I have details, and I suggest several … Continue reading
Posted in Advocacy
Tagged action, DHHS, government, NIH, occupy, P2P, politics, priorities, recommendations, speaking out
15 Comments
Laura Hillenbrand is Not Your Bitch*
Laura Hillenbrand is a New York Times best selling author, and one of the most prominent public figures to speak out about having ME/CFS. She has donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to ME/CFS research, has discussed her struggles with … Continue reading
Posted in Advocacy
Tagged back off, celebrity, coping, gratitude, living with, media, occupy, profile, publicity, speaking out
34 Comments
P2P Report: First Read
The P2P Panel’s draft report on advancing ME/CFS research has been published. The report is not the nightmare that many people feared, but it is also not what I had hoped for or what we need. The advocacy chatter I’ve … Continue reading
Posted in Advocacy, Research
Tagged action, case definition, DHHS, funding, government, NIH, occupy, P2P, politics, priorities, recommendations, researchers, speaking out
38 Comments
The Oxford Problem
Today, I’m very pleased to share this guest post by Chris Heppner. I loved Oxford when there as undergraduate (1951-4)–truly a city of dreaming spires, peaceful libraries, walks in the country to a lovely old pub by a waterfall with … Continue reading
Posted in Commentary, Research
Tagged AHRQ, case definition, CBT, GET, government, NIH, occupy, Oxford, P2P, politics, post-exertional malaise, psychosocial, speaking out
10 Comments
CFSAC: Stand Up for Your Work
I delivered this public comment by telephone at the December 3, 2014 CFS Advisory Committee meeting. This committee’s legitimacy is at stake. Nine months ago, your March meeting recommendations were substantially altered after your public vote. Documentary evidence that I … Continue reading
Posted in Advocacy, Commentary
Tagged action, CFSAC, DHHS, FACA, government, occupy, politics, recommendations, speaking out, testimony
10 Comments
A Big Helping of Defamation
I’m going public with an incident that exposes the dirty underbelly of the ME/CFS community. It’s not the first time I’ve been personally targeted, and surely won’t be the last. But bullying and defamation directed at me, or any other … Continue reading
Posted in Advocacy, Commentary
Tagged government, living with, occupy, P2P, speaking out, truth
58 Comments
Another CFSAC Violation
Today I must report that once again, the CFS Advisory Committee violated federal law. This time, recommendations made by the Committee were illegally altered after the public meeting. The story of what happened, how I got it fixed (hopefully), and … Continue reading
Posted in Advocacy
Tagged action, CFSAC, DHHS, FACA, government, occupy, politics, recommendations, speaking out
32 Comments
CFSAC SNAFU
We’ve known about the CFS Advisory Committee meeting on December 3rd and 4th for awhile, but yesterday the details came out about the agenda and public comment. Judging from the advocates I’ve talked to, it’s not going over well. If … Continue reading
Posted in Advocacy
Tagged action, CFSAC, DHHS, government, occupy, politics, recommendations, speaking out, suffering, testimony
13 Comments
P2P: Eating Your Cake
In a surprising move at the P2P Workshop yesterday, Dr. Beth Smith from the Evidence Practice Center (authors of the systematic evidence review) suggested: “Consider retiring the Oxford case definition.” Why was this remarkable? Because the systematic evidence review had … Continue reading →