Tag Archives: NIH

Expired Opportunities

Posted on March 10, 2015 by Jennie Spotila

NIH funding of ME/CFS research has bumped up against a deadline that could have dire consequences for 2015 and beyond. The primary mechanism for grant applications has expired. Grant applications to NIH must be submitted in response to calls for … Continue reading →

Posted in Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 18 Comments

2014 NIH Spending on ME/CFS Studies

Posted on March 4, 2015 by Jennie Spotila

Update: This post was revised on October 29, 2016 to correct mathematical errors and update the included research. There is no denying or avoiding the importance of the IOM report and its associated controversies, but ME/CFS advocates must keep eyes … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 30 Comments

Your Move, HHS

Posted on February 17, 2015 by Jennie Spotila

Since the IOM report came out, the patient/advocate online community has been on fire. Everyone is staking out a position. You like the name, or you don’t; you think the definition will work, or it won’t. And I have plenty … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy, Commentary | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 35 Comments

IOM: Report Card

Posted on February 10, 2015 by Jennie Spotila

It’s here. A new case definition and a new name. It will take some time for me to get through the 300 page report and prepare a more detailed analysis. But based on the press conference and summary, how did … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy, Commentary | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 61 Comments

CFSAC Meets P2P

Posted on January 15, 2015 by Jennie Spotila

Mary Dimmock has been kind enough to provide this post and transcript of the CFS Advisory Committee’s discussion of the P2P report this week. Since the Executive Summary for the P2P ME/CFS Workshop was published on December 18, 2014, a … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

P2P Obstacles

Posted on January 7, 2015 by Jennie Spotila

Are you working on your comments on the P2P Panel’s Draft Report? I hope so! Unfortunately, the Office of Disease Prevention (ODP) has taken several actions that create barriers in the commenting process. I have details, and I suggest several … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 15 Comments

P2P Report: First Read

Posted on December 19, 2014 by Jennie Spotila

The P2P Panel’s draft report on advancing ME/CFS research has been published. The report is not the nightmare that many people feared, but it is also not what I had hoped for or what we need. The advocacy chatter I’ve … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 38 Comments

P2P: Eating Your Cake

Posted on December 10, 2014 by Jennie Spotila

In a surprising move at the P2P Workshop yesterday, Dr. Beth Smith from the Evidence Practice Center (authors of the systematic evidence review) suggested: “Consider retiring the Oxford case definition.” Why was this remarkable? Because the systematic evidence review had … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy, Commentary, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 48 Comments

The Oxford Problem

Posted on December 8, 2014 by Jennie Spotila

Today, I’m very pleased to share this guest post by Chris Heppner. I loved Oxford when there as undergraduate (1951-4)–truly a city of dreaming spires, peaceful libraries, walks in the country to a lovely old pub by a waterfall with … Continue reading →

Posted in Commentary, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 10 Comments

NIH: Passing ME/CFS Over Again

Posted on December 1, 2014 by Jennie Spotila

NIH will (in its own mind anyway) be showcasing ME/CFS at the P2P Workshop next week. But ME/CFS research at NIH is caught in a never-ending cycle of being passed over in every way that matters. At its June 2014 … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments