Tag Archives: politics

CFSAC Meets P2P

Posted on January 15, 2015 by Jennie Spotila

Mary Dimmock has been kind enough to provide this post and transcript of the CFS Advisory Committee’s discussion of the P2P report this week. Since the Executive Summary for the P2P ME/CFS Workshop was published on December 18, 2014, a … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

P2P Obstacles

Posted on January 7, 2015 by Jennie Spotila

Are you working on your comments on the P2P Panel’s Draft Report? I hope so! Unfortunately, the Office of Disease Prevention (ODP) has taken several actions that create barriers in the commenting process. I have details, and I suggest several … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 15 Comments

P2P Report: First Read

Posted on December 19, 2014 by Jennie Spotila

The P2P Panel’s draft report on advancing ME/CFS research has been published. The report is not the nightmare that many people feared, but it is also not what I had hoped for or what we need. The advocacy chatter I’ve … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 38 Comments

P2P: Eating Your Cake

Posted on December 10, 2014 by Jennie Spotila

In a surprising move at the P2P Workshop yesterday, Dr. Beth Smith from the Evidence Practice Center (authors of the systematic evidence review) suggested: “Consider retiring the Oxford case definition.” Why was this remarkable? Because the systematic evidence review had … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy, Commentary, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 48 Comments

The Oxford Problem

Posted on December 8, 2014 by Jennie Spotila

Today, I’m very pleased to share this guest post by Chris Heppner. I loved Oxford when there as undergraduate (1951-4)–truly a city of dreaming spires, peaceful libraries, walks in the country to a lovely old pub by a waterfall with … Continue reading →

Posted in Commentary, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 10 Comments

CFSAC: Stand Up for Your Work

Posted on December 3, 2014 by Jennie Spotila

I delivered this public comment by telephone at the December 3, 2014 CFS Advisory Committee meeting. This committee’s legitimacy is at stake. Nine months ago, your March meeting recommendations were substantially altered after your public vote. Documentary evidence that I … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy, Commentary | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 10 Comments

NIH: Passing ME/CFS Over Again

Posted on December 1, 2014 by Jennie Spotila

NIH will (in its own mind anyway) be showcasing ME/CFS at the P2P Workshop next week. But ME/CFS research at NIH is caught in a never-ending cycle of being passed over in every way that matters. At its June 2014 … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

Another CFSAC Violation

Posted on November 24, 2014 by Jennie Spotila

Today I must report that once again, the CFS Advisory Committee violated federal law. This time, recommendations made by the Committee were illegally altered after the public meeting. The story of what happened, how I got it fixed (hopefully), and … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 32 Comments

CFSAC SNAFU

Posted on November 19, 2014 by Jennie Spotila

We’ve known about the CFS Advisory Committee meeting on December 3rd and 4th for awhile, but yesterday the details came out about the agenda and public comment. Judging from the advocates I’ve talked to, it’s not going over well. If … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 13 Comments

P2P: Not This Science

Posted on November 17, 2014 by Jennie Spotila

The P2P Workshop agenda focuses on a few broad categories of ME/CFS research: characteristics of the ME/CFS population; fostering innovative research; presentation and diagnosis in clinic; and, tools and measures for diagnosis and outcomes. Yet even with the late addition … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 14 Comments