Tag Archives: IOM

Case Definition Bingo

Posted on March 23, 2015 by Jennie Spotila

Our disease is plagued by too many case definitions, with the Institute of Medicine’s Systemic Exertion Intolerance Disease (SEID) being the most recent. Our federal agencies are thus far continuing the agnostic position of accepting whatever case definitions are proposed … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy, Commentary | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 40 Comments

PEM Differential

Posted on February 25, 2015 by Jennie Spotila

One of the post-IOM controversies consuming advocates at the moment is the concern that SEID criteria are non-specific and will include people who do not have our disease. The failure to list exclusionary conditions, including psychological disorders, has drawn criticism … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy, Commentary, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 42 Comments

Your Move, HHS

Posted on February 17, 2015 by Jennie Spotila

Since the IOM report came out, the patient/advocate online community has been on fire. Everyone is staking out a position. You like the name, or you don’t; you think the definition will work, or it won’t. And I have plenty … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy, Commentary | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 35 Comments

NPR Interview

Posted on February 11, 2015 by Jennie Spotila

Miriam Tucker has been covering ME/CFS for some time now, and published a great piece for NPR about the IOM report today. I was interviewed for the piece, and I can say that Miriam understands this disease, much like David … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy, Commentary | Tagged , , , , , , , | 19 Comments

IOM: Report Card

Posted on February 10, 2015 by Jennie Spotila

It’s here. A new case definition and a new name. It will take some time for me to get through the 300 page report and prepare a more detailed analysis. But based on the press conference and summary, how did … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy, Commentary | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 61 Comments

IOM: The Big Day

Posted on February 6, 2015 by Jennie Spotila

On February 10th, the Institute of Medicine committee will release its report Beyond ME/CFS: Redefining an Illness. The release event will be webcast at 11am Eastern. The report contents are under embargo until the release, although rumors are flying about … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy, Commentary, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 19 Comments

P2P and Dr. Francis Collins

Posted on November 10, 2014 by Jennie Spotila

On January 3, 2014, just three days before the P2P Working Group meeting, a troubling series of emails was exchanged among NIH leadership. These emails show confusion at the leadership level about the ME/CFS P2P and IOM efforts, and a … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 26 Comments

Burning Underground

Posted on September 3, 2014 by Jennie Spotila

Just over a year ago, advocate Leela Play noticed something odd on a federal contracting website. What she found was a notice of intent to award a sole source contract to the Institute of Medicine to create clinical diagnostic criteria … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy, Commentary | Tagged , , , , , , , | 11 Comments

P2P: The Question They Will Not Ask

Posted on July 21, 2014 by Jennie Spotila

by Mary Dimmock and Jennie Spotila The most important question about ME/CFS – the question that is the cornerstone for every aspect of ME/CFS science – is the question that the P2P Workshop will not ask: How do ME and … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy, Commentary, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 38 Comments

Guest Post: Longtime Patient, New Advocate

Posted on June 30, 2014 by Jennie Spotila

I am very pleased to share this guest post from Darlene Prestwich in which she shares her experiences as a new(ish) advocate. I’ve been doing this so long, sometimes I forget what it was like to jump in the deep … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy, Commentary | Tagged , , , , , , , | 12 Comments