Subscribe to Blog via Email
Pages
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Jennie Spotila on Getting a Normal Result
- Maureen on Getting a Normal Result
- Kathy Durkin on Getting a Normal Result
- Jennie Spotila on Getting a Normal Result
- Jennie Spotila on Getting a Normal Result
Archives
- October 2024
- September 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- June 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- August 2022
- May 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- November 2019
- August 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
Meta
Tags
- accountability
- action
- activism
- biomarkers
- case definition
- CBT
- CDC
- CFIDS Association
- CFSAC
- coping
- covid-19
- CPET
- DHHS
- disability
- drugs
- exercise
- family
- FDA
- funding
- GET
- government
- grants
- IOM
- living with
- Millions Missing
- NIH
- occupy
- orthostatic intolerance
- P2P
- pacing
- pain
- politics
- post-exertional malaise
- priorities
- psychosocial
- recommendations
- researchers
- RFA
- RFA Ticker
- speaking out
- spending
- stress
- suffering
- testimony
- treatment
Category Archives: Advocacy
CFSAC Around the Corner
The next meeting of the CFS Advisory Committee will be held Thursday, January 12th, and Friday, January 13th. This is an in-person meeting, and will also be webcast. Note that the Thursday meeting runs from 12 pm to 5pm, while … Continue reading
Posted in Advocacy
Tagged accountability, action, CDC, CFSAC, DHHS, funding, government, NIH, occupy, politics, priorities, recommendations, speaking out, testimony
8 Comments
RFA Ticker, 12/19/16
There was a veritable flurry of RFAs last week, with the most issued in any single week since I started tracking last year. But more than halfway through December, the promised RFAs for the ME/CFS research consortium and data center … Continue reading
Posted in Advocacy, Research
Tagged accountability, action, funding, government, grants, NIH, politics, priorities, recommendations, researchers, RFA, RFA Ticker, speaking out, spending
4 Comments
RFA Ticker, 12/12/16
It’s December and the news we’ve all been waiting for – the announcement of ME/CFS RFAs – has not come. But other things of note have been happening. On the RFA front, NIH has passed half a billion dollars in … Continue reading
Posted in Advocacy, Research
Tagged accountability, action, funding, government, grants, NIH, P2P, politics, priorities, recommendations, researchers, RFA, RFA Ticker, speaking out, spending
9 Comments
RFA Ticker, 12/5/16
The news in the past week was more about NIH generally, rather than ME specifically. President-elect Trump has nominated Representative Tom Price to be Secretary of HHS. This has touched off a war of words within the medical community, as … Continue reading
Posted in Advocacy, Research
Tagged accountability, action, funding, government, grants, NIH, politics, priorities, recommendations, researchers, RFA, RFA Ticker, speaking out, spending
6 Comments
RFA Ticker, 11/28/16
A short week due to the Thanksgiving holiday doesn’t slow NIH down, apparently. More than $40 million was committed to RFAs last week. ME/CFS research didn’t even get the giblets. Will we be more successful in December? Here are the … Continue reading
Posted in Advocacy, Research
Tagged accountability, action, funding, government, grants, NIH, politics, priorities, researchers, RFA, RFA Ticker, speaking out, spending
4 Comments
RFA Ticker, 11/21/16
The big news (apart from the election, of course) is that Carol Head and Dr. Zaher Nahle of the Solve ME/CFS Initiative had a brief meeting with Dr. Francis Collins, Director of NIH. SMCI reported: Dr. Collins could not offer … Continue reading
Posted in Advocacy, Research
Tagged accountability, action, funding, government, grants, NIH, politics, priorities, recommendations, researchers, RFA, RFA Ticker, speaking out, spending
7 Comments
RFA Ticker, 11/14/16
It got a bit crazy with NIH last week, didn’t it? The talk by Dr. Shorter went ahead as scheduled on November 9th, much to the chagrin of the entire patient community. Afterwards, NIH issued a follow up response which … Continue reading
Posted in Advocacy, Research
Tagged accountability, action, funding, government, grants, NIH, politics, priorities, recommendations, researchers, RFA, RFA Ticker, speaking out, spending
12 Comments
The Proverbial Olive Branch
In what will probably be the last word from NIH on the invited lecture by Dr. Edward Shorter, the Trans-NIH ME/CFS Working Group has issued a follow up response to the ME community. For background, read my open letter to … Continue reading
Posted in Advocacy, Commentary, Research
Tagged accountability, action, antiscience, biomarkers, CBT, delusional, denial, DHHS, discredited, funding, government, IOM, NIH, partnership, politics, priorities, psychogenic, psychosocial, researchers, respect, speaking out, spending
21 Comments
Small Steps of Progress
Progress, no matter how small, is still progress. Any tiny incremental change advocates can achieve is improvement, and it’s important to acknowledge when it happens. I am pleased to report that NIH has taken a small step towards providing more … Continue reading
Posted in Advocacy, Research
Tagged accountability, action, funding, government, grant review, grants, NIH, priorities, recommendations, researchers, SEP, speaking out, spending, transparency
21 Comments
The Government Attitude Needed
Government/advocate interactions frequently happen on a public stage, where everyone is rightly careful about what they say. Sometimes, though, we can get access to behind the scenes communication. In emails that the authors probably believed would remain private, we can … Continue reading →