Subscribe to Blog via Email
Pages
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Jennie Spotila on Getting a Normal Result
- Maureen on Getting a Normal Result
- Kathy Durkin on Getting a Normal Result
- Jennie Spotila on Getting a Normal Result
- Jennie Spotila on Getting a Normal Result
Archives
- October 2024
- September 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- June 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- August 2022
- May 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- November 2019
- August 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
Meta
Tags
- accountability
- action
- activism
- biomarkers
- case definition
- CBT
- CDC
- CFIDS Association
- CFSAC
- coping
- covid-19
- CPET
- DHHS
- disability
- drugs
- exercise
- family
- FDA
- funding
- GET
- government
- grants
- IOM
- living with
- Millions Missing
- NIH
- occupy
- orthostatic intolerance
- P2P
- pacing
- pain
- politics
- post-exertional malaise
- priorities
- psychosocial
- recommendations
- researchers
- RFA
- RFA Ticker
- speaking out
- spending
- stress
- suffering
- testimony
- treatment
Author Archives: Jennie Spotila
CFSAC Renewed
As expected, the charter for the CFS Advisory Committee has been renewed for another two years. This has become a routine operation, but the new charter makes some intriguing changes to the CFSAC. I also have new information on potential … Continue reading
Posted in Advocacy
Tagged accountability, action, CFSAC, charter, DHHS, government, politics, priorities, recommendations, researchers, speaking out
11 Comments
RFA Ticker, 9/12/16
I have to admit, maintaining this RFA Ticker is a bit like watching a train wreck in slow motion. As the fiscal year winds down, and the RFAs slowly shrink in size and number, I keep asking “Will they or … Continue reading
Posted in Advocacy, Research
Tagged accountability, action, funding, government, grants, NIH, politics, priorities, recommendations, researchers, RFA, RFA Ticker, speaking out, spending
6 Comments
RFA Ticker, 9/5/16
Another light week – a mere $11 million for diseases that are not ME. Cort Johnson reported that NIH is preparing two RFAs, one for collaborative research centers and one for a Data Management Coordinating Center. Marian Emr told me, … Continue reading
Posted in Advocacy, Research
Tagged accountability, action, funding, government, grants, NIH, politics, priorities, recommendations, researchers, RFA, RFA Ticker, speaking out, spending
3 Comments
RFA Ticker, 8/29/16
Last week was surprisingly light for RFAs. NIH issued five RFAs, setting aside $14.3 million for those projects. One of the RFAs may be of particular interest to the ME community. The National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Stroke issued … Continue reading
Posted in Advocacy, Research
Tagged accountability, action, funding, government, grants, NIH, politics, priorities, recommendations, researchers, RFA, RFA Ticker, speaking out, spending
1 Comment
Fact Checking, Dr. Nath
This is the first of a two part series. Part One describes the controversy and my fact checking. Part Two will present my analysis of what I found. As part of the renewed focus on ME/CFS at NIH, the National … Continue reading
Posted in Advocacy, Commentary, Research
Tagged accountability, blame, government, NIH, NINDS, participation, politics, psychological, psychosocial, researchers, speaking out, stereotypes
29 Comments
RFA Ticker, 8/22/16
As I predicted, last week was another bonanza for RFAs. Another $130 million dollars was set aside, and NIH has now issued $2.6 billion in RFAs this fiscal year. There’s a package for clinical centers and a data coordinating center … Continue reading
Posted in Advocacy, Research
Tagged accountability, action, funding, government, grants, NIH, politics, priorities, recommendations, researchers, RFA, RFA Ticker, speaking out, spending
6 Comments
AHRQ Evidence Review Changes Its Conclusions
Mary Dimmock has led the way on this issue, and is co-author of this post. In response to requests by U.S. patient organizations and advocates, the U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) has issued an Addendum to its … Continue reading
Posted in Advocacy, Commentary, Research
Tagged accountability, AHRQ, case definition, CBT, CDC, DHHS, evidence review, exercise, GET, government, living with, NIH, P2P, pacing, politics, psychosocial, recommendations, speaking out, systematic review, treatment
47 Comments
RFA Ticker, 8/15/16
It’s a good thing I was forced to write this post lying down, because I might have passed out or thrown up when I saw the RFA totals for last week. Take precautions before you keep reading: NIH issued more … Continue reading
Posted in Advocacy, Research
Tagged accountability, action, funding, government, grants, NIH, politics, priorities, recommendations, researchers, RFA, RFA Ticker, speaking out, spending
10 Comments
Reality Checking, Dr. Nath
This is the second of a two part series. Part One described the controversy and my fact checking. Part Two presents my analysis of the potential danger to the Clinical Care study. As part of the renewed focus on ME/CFS … Continue reading →