Subscribe to Blog via Email
Pages
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Jennie Spotila on Getting a Normal Result
- Maureen on Getting a Normal Result
- Kathy Durkin on Getting a Normal Result
- Jennie Spotila on Getting a Normal Result
- Jennie Spotila on Getting a Normal Result
Archives
- October 2024
- September 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- June 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- August 2022
- May 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- November 2019
- August 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
Meta
Tags
- accountability
- action
- activism
- biomarkers
- case definition
- CBT
- CDC
- CFIDS Association
- CFSAC
- coping
- covid-19
- CPET
- DHHS
- disability
- drugs
- exercise
- family
- FDA
- funding
- GET
- government
- grants
- IOM
- living with
- Millions Missing
- NIH
- occupy
- orthostatic intolerance
- P2P
- pacing
- pain
- politics
- post-exertional malaise
- priorities
- psychosocial
- recommendations
- researchers
- RFA
- RFA Ticker
- speaking out
- spending
- stress
- suffering
- testimony
- treatment
Tag Archives: IOM panel
IOM: The Big Day
On February 10th, the Institute of Medicine committee will release its report Beyond ME/CFS: Redefining an Illness. The release event will be webcast at 11am Eastern. The report contents are under embargo until the release, although rumors are flying about … Continue reading
Posted in Advocacy, Commentary, Research
Tagged case definition, DHHS, government, IOM, IOM panel, orthostatic intolerance, pain, politics, post-exertional malaise, psychosocial, recommendations, speaking out
19 Comments
Reading Tea Leaves
In a report issued on March 12, the IOM panel tasked with creating a new case definition for Gulf War Illness declined to do so. This is the first time the IOM was attempting to create a disease case definition, … Continue reading
Posted in Advocacy
Tagged case definition, IOM, IOM panel, politics, post-exertional malaise, psychosocial, recommendations, researchers, speaking out
4 Comments
My Feedback to the Institute of Medicine
Today, I submitted the following letter to the Institute of Medicine with my feedback on the panel for the Diagnostic Criteria for ME/CFS. Seven other advocates signed the letter: Chris Heppner, Claudia Goodell, Joe Landson, Denise Lopez-Majano, Matina Nicholson, Darlene … Continue reading
Posted in Advocacy, Commentary
Tagged action, case definition, government, IOM, IOM panel, politics, profile, researchers, speaking out
34 Comments
IOM Panelists: TL; DR
I realize that the past two weeks have been a veritable blog-alanche here at Occupy CFS. There’s been more research and writing here on the IOM ME/CFS panel than any other place online of which I am aware. I know … Continue reading
Posted in Advocacy, Commentary
Tagged action, case definition, government, IOM, IOM panel, politics, profile, researchers, speaking out
8 Comments
IOM Panelists: Submitting Feedback
Feedback to the Institute of Medicine on the provisional committee appointments for the ME/CFS clinical definition study is due December 23rd. Not everyone in the advocacy community believes submitting feedback is appropriate. But if you wish to provide any input … Continue reading
Posted in Advocacy
Tagged case definition, government, IOM, IOM panel, politics, profile, speaking out
Comments Off on IOM Panelists: Submitting Feedback
IOM Panelists: Balance = Experts + Information – Bias
The issue on everyone’s mind is whether the Institute of Medicine panel is the right group to come up with a new ME/CFS clinical case definition. Our team has been debating this for nearly two weeks now, and we have … Continue reading
Posted in Advocacy, Commentary
Tagged case definition, government, IOM, IOM panel, politics, profile, researchers, speaking out
16 Comments
IOM Panelists: Balancing Act
There is a good deal more to discuss about the Institute of Medicine ME/CFS case definition panelists beyond their individual backgrounds (see the known and unknown panelists’ profiles). Our team has been grappling with those issues, not always achieving consensus. … Continue reading
Posted in Advocacy, Commentary
Tagged case definition, government, IOM, IOM panel, politics, profile, researchers, speaking out
44 Comments
IOM Panelists: The Knowns
In this post, we present profiles of the eight members of the Institute of Medicine ME/CFS definition panel who are known to the ME/CFS community in some capacity. Many, but not all, of them are ME/CFS experts in that they … Continue reading
Posted in Advocacy, Commentary
Tagged action, case definition, government, IOM, IOM panel, politics, profile, researchers, speaking out
24 Comments
IOM Panelists: The Unknowns
In this post, we present profiles of the seven members of the Institute of Medicine ME/CFS definition panel who were unknown to the ME/CFS community. You can read about the team who put this together and the methods we used … Continue reading
Posted in Advocacy, Commentary
Tagged action, case definition, IOM, IOM panel, politics, profile, researchers, speaking out
34 Comments
This Week in Virology Covers ME/CFS
You may remember This Week in Virology (TWiV) from their XMRV coverage several years ago. I’ve remained an avid listener of the show, simply because it is such a great ongoing conversation about science. And TWiV has continued its coverage … Continue reading →