Tag Archives: GET

The Burial of ME

Posted on May 8, 2015 by Jennie Spotila

Mary Dimmock has published an extraordinary review of the last thirty years of ME history. With her permission, I’ve reported her announcement with the link to the full document below. I highly recommend reading as much of this document as … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy, Commentary, Occupying, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 14 Comments

The Oxford Problem

Posted on December 8, 2014 by Jennie Spotila

Today, I’m very pleased to share this guest post by Chris Heppner. I loved Oxford when there as undergraduate (1951-4)–truly a city of dreaming spires, peaceful libraries, walks in the country to a lovely old pub by a waterfall with … Continue reading →

Posted in Commentary, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 10 Comments

P2P Agenda: What the Huh?

Posted on October 31, 2014 by Jennie Spotila

Less than six weeks from the NIH P2P Workshop on ME/CFS, and we now have an agenda with speakers and talk titles.  So is it good or bad? I reached out to the six ME/CFS members of the Working Groups … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 49 Comments

Evidence Review Comments Preview

Posted on October 15, 2014 by Jennie Spotila

This post comes via Mary Dimmock, Claudia Goodell, Denise Lopez-Majano, and myself. You are welcome to publish it on your site with attribution and a link back to this post. You are also welcome to use this (and other material … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy, Commentary | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 24 Comments

They Know What They’re Doing (Not)

Posted on October 6, 2014 by Jennie Spotila

This post comes via Mary Dimmock, with assistance from Claudia Goodell, Denise Lopez-Majano, and myself. You are welcome to publish it on your site with attribution to Mary Dimmock.   Last week, Jennie Spotila and Erica Verillo posted summaries of … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy, Commentary | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 18 Comments

A Review of the P2P Systematic Review

Posted on September 29, 2014 by Jennie Spotila

The draft systematic evidence review on the Diagnosis and Treatment of ME/CFS was published online last week. It’s a monster – 416 pages in total. I know many ME/CFS patients may not be able to read this report, so in … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy, Commentary, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 44 Comments

Draft Systematic Review is UP

Posted on September 22, 2014 by Jennie Spotila

The draft systematic evidence review on the Diagnosis and Treatment of ME/CFS has been published. This review is extraordinarily important because it is being presented to the P2P Panel in a closed door session any day now. This review will … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

P2P: Taking Shape

Posted on June 20, 2014 by Jennie Spotila

The P2P ME/CFS Workshop has been approved and is scheduled for December 9-10th, 2014. The focus of this post is on analyzing four components of the information released by NIH yesterday: P2P is describing our disease as fatigue, without post-exertional … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 13 Comments

Protocol for Disaster?

Posted on May 2, 2014 by Jennie Spotila

The study protocol for the systematic review of ME/CFS was posted by the Agency for Healthcare and Research Quality yesterday. It’s a recipe for disaster on its own, and within the broader context of the NIH P2P Workshop it’s even … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy, Commentary, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 44 Comments

Changing Tactics

Posted on March 24, 2014 by Jennie Spotila

For decades, ME/CFS research and clinical care has been plagued by disagreement over the basic classification of the illness. Is ME/CFS a physical disease, as many patients and researchers insist? Or is it a mental health disorder perpetuated by deconditioning, … Continue reading →

Posted in Commentary | Tagged , , , , , , , | 33 Comments