Tag Archives: post-exertional malaise

IOM: Report Card

Posted on February 10, 2015 by Jennie Spotila

It’s here. A new case definition and a new name. It will take some time for me to get through the 300 page report and prepare a more detailed analysis. But based on the press conference and summary, how did … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy, Commentary | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 61 Comments

IOM: The Big Day

Posted on February 6, 2015 by Jennie Spotila

On February 10th, the Institute of Medicine committee will release its report Beyond ME/CFS: Redefining an Illness. The release event will be webcast at 11am Eastern. The report contents are under embargo until the release, although rumors are flying about … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy, Commentary, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 19 Comments

CFSAC Meets P2P

Posted on January 15, 2015 by Jennie Spotila

Mary Dimmock has been kind enough to provide this post and transcript of the CFS Advisory Committee’s discussion of the P2P report this week. Since the Executive Summary for the P2P ME/CFS Workshop was published on December 18, 2014, a … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

P2P: Eating Your Cake

Posted on December 10, 2014 by Jennie Spotila

In a surprising move at the P2P Workshop yesterday, Dr. Beth Smith from the Evidence Practice Center (authors of the systematic evidence review) suggested: “Consider retiring the Oxford case definition.” Why was this remarkable? Because the systematic evidence review had … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy, Commentary, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 48 Comments

The Oxford Problem

Posted on December 8, 2014 by Jennie Spotila

Today, I’m very pleased to share this guest post by Chris Heppner. I loved Oxford when there as undergraduate (1951-4)–truly a city of dreaming spires, peaceful libraries, walks in the country to a lovely old pub by a waterfall with … Continue reading →

Posted in Commentary, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 10 Comments

They Know What They’re Doing (Not)

Posted on October 6, 2014 by Jennie Spotila

This post comes via Mary Dimmock, with assistance from Claudia Goodell, Denise Lopez-Majano, and myself. You are welcome to publish it on your site with attribution to Mary Dimmock.   Last week, Jennie Spotila and Erica Verillo posted summaries of … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy, Commentary | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 18 Comments

Draft Systematic Review is UP

Posted on September 22, 2014 by Jennie Spotila

The draft systematic evidence review on the Diagnosis and Treatment of ME/CFS has been published. This review is extraordinarily important because it is being presented to the P2P Panel in a closed door session any day now. This review will … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

IOM: Sum of the Whole Matter

Posted on May 10, 2014 by Jennie Spotila

The IOM panel on ME/CFS held its second (and likely final) public meeting on May 5, 2014. On display near the meeting room was this painting by Robert Van Vranken: Untitled (Everything at once, or one thing at a time?). … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 12 Comments

Protocol for Disaster?

Posted on May 2, 2014 by Jennie Spotila

The study protocol for the systematic review of ME/CFS was posted by the Agency for Healthcare and Research Quality yesterday. It’s a recipe for disaster on its own, and within the broader context of the NIH P2P Workshop it’s even … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy, Commentary, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 44 Comments

Reading Tea Leaves

Posted on March 24, 2014 by Jennie Spotila

In a report issued on March 12, the IOM panel tasked with creating a new case definition for Gulf War Illness declined to do so. This is the first time the IOM was attempting to create a disease case definition, … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments