Category Archives: Research

P2P: Eating Your Cake

Posted on December 10, 2014 by Jennie Spotila

In a surprising move at the P2P Workshop yesterday, Dr. Beth Smith from the Evidence Practice Center (authors of the systematic evidence review) suggested: “Consider retiring the Oxford case definition.” Why was this remarkable? Because the systematic evidence review had … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy, Commentary, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 48 Comments

The Oxford Problem

Posted on December 8, 2014 by Jennie Spotila

Today, I’m very pleased to share this guest post by Chris Heppner. I loved Oxford when there as undergraduate (1951-4)–truly a city of dreaming spires, peaceful libraries, walks in the country to a lovely old pub by a waterfall with … Continue reading →

Posted in Commentary, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 10 Comments

NIH: Passing ME/CFS Over Again

Posted on December 1, 2014 by Jennie Spotila

NIH will (in its own mind anyway) be showcasing ME/CFS at the P2P Workshop next week. But ME/CFS research at NIH is caught in a never-ending cycle of being passed over in every way that matters. At its June 2014 … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

P2P: Not This Science

Posted on November 17, 2014 by Jennie Spotila

The P2P Workshop agenda focuses on a few broad categories of ME/CFS research: characteristics of the ME/CFS population; fostering innovative research; presentation and diagnosis in clinic; and, tools and measures for diagnosis and outcomes. Yet even with the late addition … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 14 Comments

P2P and Dr. Francis Collins

Posted on November 10, 2014 by Jennie Spotila

On January 3, 2014, just three days before the P2P Working Group meeting, a troubling series of emails was exchanged among NIH leadership. These emails show confusion at the leadership level about the ME/CFS P2P and IOM efforts, and a … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 26 Comments

P2P: The Disinvite List

Posted on November 6, 2014 by Jennie Spotila

UPDATED November 10 11, 2014 (see below) Last week, I focused on the problematic choice of several speakers for the P2P Workshop. Today, we’re going to focus on the speakers who were NOT invited to the Workshop. How do I … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , | 22 Comments

P2P Agenda: What the Huh?

Posted on October 31, 2014 by Jennie Spotila

Less than six weeks from the NIH P2P Workshop on ME/CFS, and we now have an agenda with speakers and talk titles.  So is it good or bad? I reached out to the six ME/CFS members of the Working Groups … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 49 Comments

A Review of the P2P Systematic Review

Posted on September 29, 2014 by Jennie Spotila

The draft systematic evidence review on the Diagnosis and Treatment of ME/CFS was published online last week. It’s a monster – 416 pages in total. I know many ME/CFS patients may not be able to read this report, so in … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy, Commentary, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 44 Comments

P2P: The Question They Will Not Ask

Posted on July 21, 2014 by Jennie Spotila

by Mary Dimmock and Jennie Spotila The most important question about ME/CFS – the question that is the cornerstone for every aspect of ME/CFS science – is the question that the P2P Workshop will not ask: How do ME and … Continue reading →

Posted in Advocacy, Commentary, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 38 Comments

ME/CFS Mortality

Posted on July 7, 2014 by Jennie Spotila

Does ME/CFS kill? This critical question has received very little attention from researchers, but there is a way for you to help change that. The first paper on causes of death in ME/CFS was published in 2006 by Dr. Leonard … Continue reading →

Posted in Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 23 Comments