Tag Archives: GET

Showing the Back of Their Heads

The final P2P report is published, and now it’s time to evaluate the quality of the recommendations and how well the process served ME/CFS patients. There are many good things in the P2P report, and I’ll be focusing on those … Continue reading

Posted in Advocacy, Commentary | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 42 Comments

P2P Final Chapter

The final P2P ME/CFS documents are coming out today. I am severely crashed from family obligations, so in-depth analysis will take me a little longer than normal. But here are quick descriptions of the various articles to get you started: … Continue reading

Posted in Advocacy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 32 Comments

The Burial of ME

Mary Dimmock has published an extraordinary review of the last thirty years of ME history. With her permission, I’ve reported her announcement with the link to the full document below. I highly recommend reading as much of this document as … Continue reading

Posted in Advocacy, Commentary, Occupying, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 14 Comments

The Oxford Problem

Today, I’m very pleased to share this guest post by Chris Heppner. I loved Oxford when there as undergraduate (1951-4)–truly a city of dreaming spires, peaceful libraries, walks in the country to a lovely old pub by a waterfall with … Continue reading

Posted in Commentary, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 10 Comments

P2P Agenda: What the Huh?

Less than six weeks from the NIH P2P Workshop on ME/CFS, and we now have an agenda with speakers and talk titles.  So is it good or bad? I reached out to the six ME/CFS members of the Working Groups … Continue reading

Posted in Advocacy, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 49 Comments

Evidence Review Comments Preview

This post comes via Mary Dimmock, Claudia Goodell, Denise Lopez-Majano, and myself. You are welcome to publish it on your site with attribution and a link back to this post. You are also welcome to use this (and other material … Continue reading

Posted in Advocacy, Commentary | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 24 Comments

They Know What They’re Doing (Not)

This post comes via Mary Dimmock, with assistance from Claudia Goodell, Denise Lopez-Majano, and myself. You are welcome to publish it on your site with attribution to Mary Dimmock.   Last week, Jennie Spotila and Erica Verillo posted summaries of … Continue reading

Posted in Advocacy, Commentary | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 18 Comments

A Review of the P2P Systematic Review

The draft systematic evidence review on the Diagnosis and Treatment of ME/CFS was published online last week. It’s a monster – 416 pages in total. I know many ME/CFS patients may not be able to read this report, so in … Continue reading

Posted in Advocacy, Commentary, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 44 Comments

Draft Systematic Review is UP

The draft systematic evidence review on the Diagnosis and Treatment of ME/CFS has been published. This review is extraordinarily important because it is being presented to the P2P Panel in a closed door session any day now. This review will … Continue reading

Posted in Advocacy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

P2P: Taking Shape

The P2P ME/CFS Workshop has been approved and is scheduled for December 9-10th, 2014. The focus of this post is on analyzing four components of the information released by NIH yesterday: P2P is describing our disease as fatigue, without post-exertional … Continue reading

Posted in Advocacy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 13 Comments